Opinion
August 9, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Quinones, J.).
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's identity beyond a reasonable doubt. All three victims had an adequate opportunity to observe the defendant during the course of his attack on each of them and made an unequivocal in-court identification (see, People v McNeil, 183 A.D.2d 790; People v Caballero, 177 A.D.2d 496). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdicts were not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).
The sentences imposed were not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05) or without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.