From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Adames

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 8, 2003
308 A.D.2d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-00425

Submitted June 17, 2003.

September 8, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), rendered January 3, 2002, as amended March 26, 2002, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Alexis A. Ascher of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Anthea H. Bruffee, and Matthew J. Sypniewski of counsel), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., SANDRA L. TOWNES, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment as amended is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the People failed to adduce legally sufficient proof of his identity as the robber beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10, 19-21). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).

PRUDENTI, P.J., TOWNES, MASTRO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Adames

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 8, 2003
308 A.D.2d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Adames

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ISMAEL ADAMES, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 8, 2003

Citations

308 A.D.2d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
764 N.Y.S.2d 200

Citing Cases

People v. Larios

05; People v. Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19-21). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the…

People v. Green

The defendant's contention that the prosecution failed to adduce legally sufficient proof of his identity as…