From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Acosta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 19, 2001
284 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

June 19, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obus, J.), rendered May 26, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to three concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Alan Gadlin, for respondent.

Joseph C. Heinzmann, Jr., for defendant-appellant.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Williams, Tom, Wallach, Friedman, JJ.


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence provided reasonable assurances of the identity and unchanged condition of the substance that was sold to the undercover officer (see, People v. Julian, 41 N.Y.2d 340), and there is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determination that the substance sold by defendant to the undercover officer was, in fact, cocaine.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence.

Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.


Summaries of

People v. Acosta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 19, 2001
284 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Acosta

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. BRYANT ACOSTA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 19, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 551