From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Acosta

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 28, 2015
124 A.D.3d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

01-28-2015

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Anthony ACOSTA, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John Castellano, Johnnette Traill, Ellen C. Abbot, and Christopher J. Blira–Koessler of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John Castellano, Johnnette Traill, Ellen C. Abbot, and Christopher J. Blira–Koessler of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered July 21, 2011, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts) and endangering the welfare of a child, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is without merit, as he did not demonstrate that there was no strategic or legitimate explanation for the defense attorneys' allegedly deficient conduct, or that they otherwise failed to provide meaningful representation (see People v. Barboni, 21 N.Y.3d 393, 406, 971 N.Y.S.2d 729, 994 N.E.2d 820 ; People v. Caban, 5 N.Y.3d 143, 152, 800 N.Y.S.2d 70, 833 N.E.2d 213 ; People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 712, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584 ; People v. Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705, 709, 530 N.Y.S.2d 52, 525 N.E.2d 698 ). Viewed in their totality, the circumstances reveal that the defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 ; People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d at 713–714, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584 ).

MASTRO, J.P., ROMAN, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Acosta

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 28, 2015
124 A.D.3d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Acosta

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Anthony ACOSTA, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 28, 2015

Citations

124 A.D.3d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
124 A.D.3d 907
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 777