From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Acosta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 10, 2020
189 A.D.3d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

12580A Ind. No. 3559/16 Case No. 2018-4665

12-10-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose ACOSTA, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jan Hoth of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Andrew E. Seewald of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jan Hoth of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Andrew E. Seewald of counsel), for respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Kern, Singh, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen N. Biben, J., at speedy trial motion and plea; Ann E. Scherzer, J., at sentencing), rendered June 8, 2018, as amended June 26, 2018, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree and attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender previously convicted of a violent felony offense, to concurrent terms of 5½ years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v. Thomas , 34 N.Y.3d 545, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 [2019], cert denied ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 2634, 206 L.Ed.2d 512 [2020] ; People v. Bryant , 28 N.Y.3d 1094, 1096, 45 N.Y.S.3d 335, 68 N.E.3d 60 [2016] ). The combination of the court's oral colloquy with defendant, and the detailed written waiver that he signed after consultation with counsel, separated the right to appeal from the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea and satisfied the requirements of a valid waiver. The waiver was comprehensive and intended to encompass all waivable issues (see People v. Kemp , 94 N.Y.2d 831, 833, 703 N.Y.S.2d 59, 724 N.E.2d 754 [1999] ).

As this Court recently held in People v. Person , 184 A.D.3d 447, 126 N.Y.S.3d 14 (1st Dept. 2020), lv denied 35 N.Y.3d 1069, 129 N.Y.S.3d 387, 152 N.E.3d 1189 (2020), under the recent amendment to the speedy trial statute, "appellate review of the denial of a statutory speedy trial motion is no longer forfeited by a guilty plea, but such review may be voluntarily waived" ( id. at 447, 126 N.Y.S.3d 14 ).

Regardless of whether defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, and whether that waiver forecloses the issues raised on this appeal, we find that defendant's speedy trial motion was properly denied. Finally, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.


Summaries of

People v. Acosta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 10, 2020
189 A.D.3d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Acosta

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose Acosta…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 10, 2020

Citations

189 A.D.3d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 7466
133 N.Y.S.3d 807

Citing Cases

People v. Votaw

837–1838, 129 N.Y.S.3d 344 [2020] ). "[G]enerally, an appeal waiver will encompass any issue that does not…

People v. Rodriguez

"Defendant was convicted before the effective date of the current version of CPL 30.30(6), which…