From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Accetta

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 21, 2007
17 Misc. 3d 126 (N.Y. App. Term 2007)

Summary

In People v Accetta (17 Misc.3d 126 [A], 2007 NY Slip Op 51807 [U], *2-3 [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2007]), the prosecutor did not subpoena material witnesses who had gone on vacation because she did not want to disturb the trip.

Summary of this case from People v. Flores

Opinion

No. 2005-1499 N CR.

September 21, 2007.


Crimes — Right to Speedy Trial. Criminal Procedure Law — § 30.30 (4) (Speedy trial; time limitations; excludable periods of time).)


Summaries of

People v. Accetta

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 21, 2007
17 Misc. 3d 126 (N.Y. App. Term 2007)

In People v Accetta (17 Misc.3d 126 [A], 2007 NY Slip Op 51807 [U], *2-3 [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2007]), the prosecutor did not subpoena material witnesses who had gone on vacation because she did not want to disturb the trip.

Summary of this case from People v. Flores
Case details for

People v. Accetta

Case Details

Full title:People v. Accetta (Russell)

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 21, 2007

Citations

17 Misc. 3d 126 (N.Y. App. Term 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 51807
851 N.Y.S.2d 59

Citing Cases

People v. South

We find that the entire time period from the date that the motion schedule was set up (December 3, 2008)…

People v. Flores

In People v Rahoman (54 Misc.3d 353, 356 [Crim Ct, Queens County 2016]), the People's effort to secure the…