From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re A.C.

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Nov 21, 2017
2d Juv. No. B282690 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 21, 2017)

Opinion

2d Juv. No. B282690

11-21-2017

In re A.C., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. A.C., Defendant and Appellant.

Bruce G. Finebaum, under appointment by the Court of Appeal for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance by Respondent.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Super. Ct. No. FJ54673)
(Los Angeles County)

A.C., a minor, appeals from the judgment entered after the juvenile court sustained a petition for felony shooting at an inhabited dwelling (Pen. Code, § 246) and declared appellant a ward of the court. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602.) The petition was sustained based on evidence that appellant fired three or four shots at the victim's house. The trial court declared the maximum period confinement to be seven years, removed appellant from the physical custody of his parents, and committed appellant to the care and custody of the probation department for purposes of placement in a five-to-seven-month camp-community program. Appellant was awarded 33 days predisposition custody credit.

We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.

On October 10, 2017, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. No response has been received to date.

We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; In re Kevin S. (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 97, 118-119.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

YEGAN, Acting P. J. We concur:

PERREN, J.

TANGEMAN, J.

Christina L. Hill, Judge


Superior Court County of Los Angeles

Bruce G. Finebaum, under appointment by the Court of Appeal for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance by Respondent.


Summaries of

In re A.C.

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Nov 21, 2017
2d Juv. No. B282690 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 21, 2017)
Case details for

In re A.C.

Case Details

Full title:In re A.C., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX

Date published: Nov 21, 2017

Citations

2d Juv. No. B282690 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 21, 2017)