From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Abuhamra

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 28, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1632 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-28

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hani ABUHAMRA, Defendant–Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.)

Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department from an order of the Erie County Court (Thomas P. Franczyk, J.), dated June 5, 2012. The order denied the motion of defendant to vacate a judgment of conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10. Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria LLP, Buffalo (Timothy P. Murphy of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (Nicholas T. Texido of Counsel), for Respondent.


Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department from an order of the Erie County Court (Thomas P. Franczyk, J.), dated June 5, 2012. The order denied the motion of defendant to vacate a judgment of conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10.
Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria LLP, Buffalo (Timothy P. Murphy of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (Nicholas T. Texido of Counsel), for Respondent.

Same Memorandum as in People v. Abuhamra (Appeal No. 1) 107 A.D.3d 1630, 968 N.Y.S.2d 294 (2013).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, and SCONIERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Abuhamra

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 28, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1632 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Abuhamra

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hani ABUHAMRA…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 28, 2013

Citations

107 A.D.3d 1632 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4922
967 N.Y.S.2d 845

Citing Cases

Abuhamra v. Graziano

The Fourth Department unanimously affirmed the trial court's denial of petitioner's § 440.10 motion. See…