From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Abrams [2d Dept 2000

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 8, 2000
272 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted April 3, 2000.

May 8, 2000.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flaherty, J.), rendered July 27, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ronald L. Kuby, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellno, Jeanette Lifschitz, and Dan Schorr of counsel), for respondent.

GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, SONDRA MILLER, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant was not deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel during his sentencing (see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137; cf., People v. Felder, 47 N.Y.2d 287).

MANGANO, P.J., BRACKEN, S. MILLER and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Abrams [2d Dept 2000

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 8, 2000
272 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Abrams [2d Dept 2000

Case Details

Full title:The People, etc., respondent, v. Samuel Abrams, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 8, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 370

Citing Cases

People v. Portillo

The defendant's claim that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel at the sentencing…

People v. Owens

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not deprived of his right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment…