From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Abodalo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 7, 2012
100 A.D.3d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-7

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jalal ABODALO, appellant.

Quadrino Schwartz, Garden City, N.Y. (Bruce A. Barket and Amy B. Marion of counsel), for appellant. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Judith R. Sternberg and Barbara Kornblau of counsel), for respondent.


Quadrino Schwartz, Garden City, N.Y. (Bruce A. Barket and Amy B. Marion of counsel), for appellant.Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Judith R. Sternberg and Barbara Kornblau of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCormack, J.), rendered November 6, 2009, convicting him of a course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree, aggravated sexual abuse in the second degree (two counts), sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), sodomy (now criminal sexual act) in the first degree (two counts), and incest in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that he was deprived of the constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel is based, in part, on matter appearing on the record and, in part, on matter outside the record, and thus constitutes a “ ‘mixed claim[ ]’ ” of ineffective assistance ( People v. Maxwell, 89 A.D.3d 1108, 1109, 933 N.Y.S.2d 386, quoting People v. Evans, 16 N.Y.3d 571, 575, 925 N.Y.S.2d 366, 949 N.E.2d 457,cert. denied––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 325, 181 L.Ed.2d 201;see People v. Jackson, 97 A.D.3d 693, 694, 947 N.Y.S.2d 613). It is not evident from the matter appearing on the record that the defendant was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel ( cf. People v. Crump, 53 N.Y.2d 824, 440 N.Y.S.2d 170, 422 N.E.2d 815;People v. Brown, 45 N.Y.2d 852, 410 N.Y.S.2d 287, 382 N.E.2d 1149). Since the defendant's claim of ineffective assistance cannot be resolved without reference to matter outside the record, a CPL 440.10 proceeding is the appropriate forum for reviewing the claim in its entirety ( see People v. Jackson, 97 A.D.3d at 694, 947 N.Y.S.2d 613;People v. Freeman, 93 A.D.3d 805, 806, 940 N.Y.S.2d 314;People v. Maxwell, 89 A.D.3d at 1109, 933 N.Y.S.2d 386).

RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, LEVENTHAL and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Abodalo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 7, 2012
100 A.D.3d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Abodalo

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jalal ABODALO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 7, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
952 N.Y.S.2d 902
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7309

Citing Cases

People v. Abodalo

He appealed from the judgment, arguing that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. This Court…