From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People of State v. Thomas

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2011
88 A.D.3d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-25

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent,v.Lemar THOMAS, appellant.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Anna Pervukhin of counsel), for appellant.Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Robert Ho on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Del Giudice, J.), dated April 27, 2009, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see *527 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631, 387 N.Y.S.2d 399; see also People v. Diaz, 76 A.D.3d 673, 905 N.Y.S.2d 918; People v. Kendle, 47 A.D.3d 783, 849 N.Y.S.2d 157).

SKELOS, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People of State v. Thomas

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2011
88 A.D.3d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People of State v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent,v.Lemar THOMAS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

88 A.D.3d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7618
931 N.Y.S.2d 526

Citing Cases

People v. Carter

DECISION ORDER We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there is no…