From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People of State v. Santiago

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2011
89 A.D.3d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-15

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent,v.Jose SANTIAGO, appellant.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (William Kastin of counsel; Meghan McCarthy on the brief), for appellant.Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Morgan J. Dennehy, and Bruce Alderman of counsel), for respondent.

Appeals by the defendant from five orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), all dated April 29, 2010, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's request for an adjournment of the SORA hearing ( see People v. Sherard, 73 A.D.3d 537, 903 N.Y.S.2d 3; People v. Wright, 53 A.D.3d 963, 964, 862 N.Y.S.2d 623; People v. Ellis, 52 A.D.3d 1272, 1273, 859 N.Y.S.2d 809; People v. Di John, 48 A.D.3d 1302, 1303, 853 N.Y.S.2d 242).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

RIVERA, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, BELEN and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People of State v. Santiago

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2011
89 A.D.3d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People of State v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent,v.Jose SANTIAGO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 15, 2011

Citations

89 A.D.3d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8336
932 N.Y.S.2d 718

Citing Cases

People v. Worrell

Here, to the extent that the defendant established facts that might warrant a downward departure from his…

People v. Lashway

We further note that defendant may make a new application for reclassification ( seeCorrection Law § 168–o…