From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People of State v. Rosado

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2011
88 A.D.3d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-25

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent,v.Marshall ROSADO, appellant.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Erin R. Collins of counsel), for appellant.Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Elisheva Mochkin on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Balter, J.), dated August 10, 2010, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant was not entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive risk level and, thus, properly designated him a level two sex offender ( see People of State of New York v. Wyatt, ––– A.D.3d ––––, 931 N.Y.S.2d 85 [2011]; People v. Livingston, 87 A.D.3d 628, 928 N.Y.S.2d 473; People v. Alston, 86 A.D.3d 553, 554, 926 N.Y.S.2d 901; People v. Rodriguez, 67 A.D.3d 596, 597, 889 N.Y.S.2d 176; People v. Adams, 44 A.D.3d 1020, 845 N.Y.S.2d 375; People v. Wragg, 41 A.D.3d 1273, 1274, 838 N.Y.S.2d 755; cf. People v. Stevens, 55 A.D.3d 892, 894, 867 N.Y.S.2d 108).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

DILLON, J.P., BALKIN, ENG and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People of State v. Rosado

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2011
88 A.D.3d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People of State v. Rosado

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent,v.Marshall ROSADO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

88 A.D.3d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7617
931 N.Y.S.2d 526