From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People of State v. Mondo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 4, 2011
88 A.D.3d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-4

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent,v.Anthony MONDO, appellant.


Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (James H. Miller of counsel), for appellant.Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Marcia R. Kucera of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated September 7, 2010, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

“A departure from the presumptive risk level is warranted where ‘there exists an aggravating or mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by the guidelines' ” ( People v. Bussie, 83 A.D.3d 920, 920–921, 920 N.Y.S.2d 718, lv. denied 17 N.Y.3d 704, 2011 WL 2535202 quoting Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 4 [2006 ed.]; see People v. Alston, 86 A.D.3d 553, 554, 926 N.Y.S.2d 901). Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant was not entitled to a downward departure and, thus, properly designated the defendant a level two sex offender ( see People v. Padro, 84 A.D.3d 1046, 922 N.Y.S.2d 808, lv. denied 17 N.Y.3d 711, 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 84341, 2011 WL 4389142 [2011] ).

DILLON, J.P., ENG, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People of State v. Mondo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 4, 2011
88 A.D.3d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People of State v. Mondo

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent,v.Anthony MONDO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 4, 2011

Citations

88 A.D.3d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7019
930 N.Y.S.2d 482

Citing Cases

People v. Quinones

A departure from the presumptive risk level is warranted where "there exists an aggravating or mitigating…