From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People of N.Y. v. Cannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 17, 2006
34 A.D.3d 1227 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. KA 05-00750.

November 17, 2006.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (John J. Brunetti, A.J.), entered February 7, 2005. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

Before: Present — Gorski, J.P., Smith, Centra and Green, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that Supreme Court erred in determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). The sworn statement upon which the court based its determination was reliable hearsay ( see People v Wroten, 286 AD2d 189, 199, lv denied 97 NY2d 610), and the court's determination of defendant's risk level is supported by the requisite clear and convincing evidence ( see Correction Law § 168-n; People v Warwick, 5 AD3d 1050, lv denied 3 NY3d 605).


Summaries of

People of N.Y. v. Cannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 17, 2006
34 A.D.3d 1227 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People of N.Y. v. Cannon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BRUCE CANNON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 17, 2006

Citations

34 A.D.3d 1227 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 8396
823 N.Y.S.2d 720

Citing Cases

People v. Mingo

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York City ( Dana Poole and Patrick J. Hynes of counsel), for…