From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People, Johnson v. Warden, Manhattan House

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 24, 1991
178 A.D.2d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

December 24, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Milano, J.).


Petitioner was released on parole on December 10, 1987, and was subsequently arrested on an unrelated charge. Having failed to appear in court for further proceedings, petitioner became the subject of parole violation and bench warrants which were lodged as detainers at petitioner's place of incarceration in South Carolina. Petitioner was returned to New York and the Division of Parole was initially so advised on March 13, 1991, but he was never "exclusively" detained on the parole violation warrant until April 4, 1991. A final parole revocation hearing was conducted on June 19, 1991, at which time parole was revoked.

We reject petitioner's argument that his final parole revocation hearing was untimely. The record reflects that petitioner was never detained "exclusively" on the basis of the parole revocation warrant, such that he would be deemed to be within the convenience and practical control of the Division of Parole at the time it received notice of his return to this State (Executive Law § 259-i [a] [iv]).

The unpublished decision and order of this Court entered herein on December 17, 1991 is hereby recalled and vacated.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

People, Johnson v. Warden, Manhattan House

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 24, 1991
178 A.D.2d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People, Johnson v. Warden, Manhattan House

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. MAXTON JOHNSON, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 24, 1991

Citations

178 A.D.2d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
579 N.Y.S.2d 1

Citing Cases

People v. State Division of Parole

The tolling period did not end when petitioner was returned to New York in the constructive custody of…