From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Uviller v. Luger

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 20, 1976
38 N.Y.2d 854 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Argued January 13, 1976

Decided January 20, 1976

Appeal from the Columbia County Court, EDWIN R. OBERWAGER, J.

Rena K. Uviller and Charles Schinitsky for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Alan W. Rubinstein and Jean M. Coon of counsel), for respondents.


Appeal transferred, without costs, to the Appellate Division, Third Department. A direct appeal does not lie since no substantial question is presented as to the constitutional validity of the challenged statute (Matter of Patricia A., 31 N.Y.2d 83; Matter of Tomasita N., 30 N.Y.2d 927, app dsmd 409 U.S. 1052; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 55, at p 254). Accordingly, the appeal must be transferred to the Appellate Division (NY Const, art VI, § 5, subd b; see, e.g., Matter of Merced v Fisher, 38 N.Y.2d 557).


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Uviller v. Luger

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 20, 1976
38 N.Y.2d 854 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Uviller v. Luger

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. RENA K. UVILLER, on Behalf of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 20, 1976

Citations

38 N.Y.2d 854 (N.Y. 1976)
382 N.Y.S.2d 58
345 N.E.2d 601

Citing Cases

Research Group v. Thruway

We dismissed the appeal ( 75 N.Y.2d 946), however, because no substantial constitutional question was…

Matter of David

The purportedly direct and dispositive constitutional issues underlying this appeal are no more than a…