From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Stenstrom v. Harnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

September, 1928.

Present — Van Kirk, P.J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ.


Decision and order amended by including therein the statement that the order is affirmed as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, and the following questions certified: 1. Should the Special Term have denied the motion for the mandamus order under article 1, section 6, of the State Constitution? 2. Should the Special Term have denied said motion because the report was not a public record?


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Stenstrom v. Harnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Stenstrom v. Harnett

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. MARIA STENSTROM, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1928

Citations

224 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)