Opinion
April 30, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (George Roberts, J.).
Based on our review of the record, we find the bail as originally set to be excessive to the extent indicated. If, indeed, the use of petitioner Scholl's Pennsylvania estate as collateral for the previously obtained surety bond violates the federal court order restricting the transfer of such property, as claimed, respondent's remedy lies in an examination as to the sufficiency of the surety. (See, CPL 520.30.)
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Carro, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.