From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex rel. Russo v. Fay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 1966
25 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

April 18, 1966


In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered December 23, 1964, which dismissed the writ after a hearing and remanded him to the custody of respondent. On November 29, 1965 this court affirmed said judgment ( 24 A.D.2d 934) but on December 27, 1965 granted relator's motion for reargument and vacated said order of affirmance. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts; writ sustained; judgment of conviction rendered January 16, 1961 vacated; and action remanded to the County Court, Nassau County, for the purpose of permitting defendant to plead de novo to the indictment. In our opinion section 335-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as it read at the time defendant pleaded guilty and prior to its amendment, effective September 1, 1963, required that the statutory warning therein prescribed be given upon his arraignment and before acceptance of the plea ( People ex rel. Manning v. Fay, 16 N.Y.2d 1061; People ex rel. Colan v. La Vallee, 14 N.Y.2d 83, 86, 87). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction must be vacated and the action remanded to the court below for the purpose of permitting defendant to plead de novo to the indictment (cf. People ex rel. Di Michele v. Fay, 20 A.D.2d 675). Beldock, P.J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People ex rel. Russo v. Fay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 1966
25 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

People ex rel. Russo v. Fay

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. VITO RUSSO, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 18, 1966

Citations

25 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

People ex rel. Miller v. Fay

Habeas corpus is the correct mode of proceeding. (See People ex rel. Manning v. Fay, 16 N.Y.2d 1061; People…

People ex rel. Carlat v. Fay

The record discloses that relator was not given the warning required under section 335-b of the Code of…