Opinion
2011-09-29
The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. Rodney McNEIL, Appellant,v.Mark L. BRADT, as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Rodney McNeil, Comstock, appellant pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marlene O. Tuczinski of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Hayden, J.), entered December 21, 2010 in Chemung County, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.
In 2008, petitioner was convicted of various crimes, including attempted murder in the second degree, and a lengthy sentence was imposed. On appeal, his convictions were upheld ( People v. McNeill, 73 A.D.3d 504, 899 N.Y.S.2d 840 [2010], lv. denied 15 N.Y.3d 922, 913 N.Y.S.2d 649, 939 N.E.2d 815 [2010] ). Thereafter, petitioner brought this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to CPLR article 70. Supreme Court denied the application without a hearing, and this appeal ensued.
Although originally sentenced to an aggregate prison term of 19 1/2 years, the judgment was modified on direct appeal to the extent of reducing the sentence for attempted murder to 15 years, resulting in a new aggregate sentence of 15 years.
Petitioner asserts that he is unlawfully detained due to jurisdictional defects in the criminal proceedings that resulted in his conviction and incarceration. However, because petitioner could have raised such claims on direct appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion, habeas corpus relief is not the appropriate remedy and we find no basis to depart from traditional orderly procedure ( see People ex rel. Rosado v. Napoli, 83 A.D.3d 1347, 1347, 920 N.Y.S.2d 922 [2011], lv. denied 17 N.Y.3d 710, 2011 WL 4356486 [2011]; People ex rel. Lopez v. People, 79 A.D.3d 1555, 1556, 913 N.Y.S.2d 429 [2010]; People ex rel. Jackson v. Rock, 67 A.D.3d 1080, 886 N.Y.S.2d 922 [2009], lv. denied 14 N.Y.3d 704, 2010 WL 607016 [2010] ). Accordingly , Supreme Court properly denied petitioner's application.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
889 MERCURE, J.P., PETERS, LAHTINEN, STEIn and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.