From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. O'Brien v. Caldwell Mfg. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 5, 1939
256 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

January 5, 1939.

Present — Sears, P.J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ. [See, also, 253 App. Div. 870; affd., 278 N.Y. 520.]


Order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The order appealed from must be affirmed for two reasons: (1) Leave to renew the motion was a condition precedent. No application for such relief was made. (2) The prior order fully determined the matter here litigated. ( Sheehan v. Carvalho, 12 App. Div. 430; Haskell v. Moran, 117 id. 251; De Lacy v. Kelly, 147 id. 37; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1332; Riggs v. Pursell, 74 N.Y. 370, 378; Matter of Livingston, 34 id. 555, 577; People ex rel. Hartford L. Ins. Co. v. Fairman, 91 id. 385, 387; Belmont v. Erie R. Co., 52 Barb. 637; Veeder v. Baker, 83 N.Y. 156, 163; United States v. Louisville Nash. R.R., 236 U.S. 318, 334; Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp., 270 N.Y. 464, 465; Matter of Steinway, 159 id. 250; People ex rel. Hasbrouck v. Supervisors, 135 id. 522, 535.) All concur. The order denies permission to relator to examine certain records of a corporation.)


Summaries of

People ex Rel. O'Brien v. Caldwell Mfg. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 5, 1939
256 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

People ex Rel. O'Brien v. Caldwell Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. JOHN G. O'BRIEN, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 5, 1939

Citations

256 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)