From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Nichols v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 1938
255 App. Div. 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

November 18, 1938.

Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County.

Harry H. Chambers of counsel [ Harry B. Chambers with him on the brief; Chambers Chambers, attorneys], for the appellants.

Otto H. Frank of counsel [ Arthur A. Segall, Hyman W. Kehl and Mendel Lurie with him on the brief; William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel], for the respondents.

Present — MARTIN, P.J., O'MALLEY, TOWNLEY, GLENNON and DORE, JJ.

Orders unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motions to confirm the referee's reports granted. Settle order on notice.


An examination of the record establishes that the relators made out a prima facie case and sustained the burden of proof by a fair preponderance of the evidence which the referee to whom the issues were referred found to be credible. The presumption on which defendants rely was overcome, but at the close of relators' case defendants rested and offered no proof whatever, though defendants' expert was present at the trial. In that state of the record it was error for the Special Term to refuse to confirm the referee's reports.

The orders of the Special Term should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motions to confirm the referee's reports granted.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Nichols v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 1938
255 App. Div. 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Nichols v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. MARY B. NICHOLS and GEORGE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1938

Citations

255 App. Div. 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Manhattan Sq. Beresford v. Sexton

We thus have a case where no testimony as to values and no substantial contradiction of the relator's…