From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Nicholas v. Mantello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 12, 1992
187 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

November 12, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Greene County (Cobb, J.).


Given that petitioner's counsel has been provided with the trial transcript as requested by the petition in this proceeding, this appeal must be dismissed as moot (see, People ex rel. Woodworth v Campbell, 176 A.D.2d 1141). Were we to address the merits, we would affirm the judgment of Supreme Court. This Court has found that delay in supplying a trial transcript to a defendant to allow for preparation of an appeal does not warrant reversal of the conviction (see, People v Eldridge, 34 A.D.2d 693). Because petitioner would not be entitled to immediate release on this ground, habeas corpus relief is inappropriate (see, People ex rel. Hatzman v Kuhlmann, 173 A.D.2d 895). To the extent that the petition may be read to argue that the delay has denied petitioner his right to appellate review, we find that his failure to show any prejudice to his appeal caused by the delay precludes habeas corpus relief (cf., Elcock v Henderson, 947 F.2d 1004; Cody v Henderson, 936 F.2d 715).

Yesawich Jr., J.P., Levine, Crew III, Casey and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Nicholas v. Mantello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 12, 1992
187 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Nicholas v. Mantello

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. JASON B. NICHOLAS, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1992

Citations

187 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Tighe

05 [2] [a], [d]). The judgment is not subject to summary reversal as a consequence of any delay in furnishing…

People v. Gibbs

Defendant's assertion that his right to due process under the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution (see, US…