Opinion
March 29, 1995
Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
We previously held that the determination of the Supreme Court, Kings County, fixing bail at $100,000, was not an improvident exercise of discretion and did not violate "`constitutional or statutory standards'" (People ex rel. Murphy v. Warden, 210 A.D.2d 190, citing People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger, 25 N.Y.2d 497, 499; see, People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson, 48 N.Y.2d 230). The alleged new circumstances set forth in this successive application for a writ of habeas corpus do not warrant a different result. Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, O'Brien and Hart, JJ., concur.