From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. McCallister v. McGinnis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 9, 1998
249 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 9, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court (Ellison, J.).


Petitioner, having been convicted of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, commenced this proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that the People knowingly presented false testimony to the Grand Jury, thereby rendering the indictment jurisdictionally defective. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and we affirm. Given that the issue could be raised on defendant's pending appeal or, more appropriately, in a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (see, CPL 440.10 [a]), we find that habeas corpus relief is unavailable (see, People ex rel. Rodriguez v. Kuhlmann, 239 A.D.2d 721, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 808). Furthermore, absent circumstances warranting a departure from traditional orderly procedure, petitioner's application for a writ was properly denied (see, id.).

Crew III, J.P., White, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. McCallister v. McGinnis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 9, 1998
249 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People ex Rel. McCallister v. McGinnis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. CHARLES McCALLISTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 9, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 535

Citing Cases

People v. Burge

He commenced this proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that the grand jury proceeding was…

People ex Rel. Charles v. DeAngelo

Supreme Court dismissed the petition and we affirm. Given that the issues could be raised on a direct appeal…