From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex rel. La Fay v. McMann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 19, 1970
33 A.D.2d 1102 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Opinion

February 19, 1970

Appeal from the Cayuga County Court.

Present — Goldman, P.J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Gabrielli and Bastow, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The requirement that a defendant be asked prior to sentencing "whether he have any legal cause to show, why judgment should not be pronounced against him" (Code Crim. Pro., § 480) is a substantial legal right that cannot be waived. ( People ex rel. Miller v. Martin, 1 N.Y.2d 406.) The reply thereto, however, like a plea of guilty, may be made through counsel (cf. People v. Sadness, 300 N.Y. 69, 73). Herein, defense counsel in response to the allocution replied at length but the court refused to permit appellant to speak except through his attorney, speaking generally, we do not approve the application of such a stringent rule. There remains, however, the issue as to whether resentence is mandated (cf. People v. Sullivan, 3 N.Y.2d 196, 198). We recognize that there are factual settings where the sentencing minutes reveal that the silencing of a defendant may well have worked an injustice and affirmative relief has been granted. ( People v. Mohney, 24 A.D.2d 1071; People ex rel. D'Agostino v. Murphy, 20 A.D.2d 756; People v. Freccia, 16 A.D.2d 885.) Such is not this case. The record reveals that the lengthy colloquies by separate defense counsel with the court on two different days related solely to appellant's presentence contention that his attorney (who appeared for him on one of these two occasions) had represented prior to entry of the guilty plea that a specific punishment would be imposed. Inasmuch as the plea empowered the court to impose a greater sentence defendant wanted to withdraw his guilty plea. In the absence of allegation or proof that either the court or prosecutor had been a party to such an agreement or representation the court properly denied motions for permission to withdraw the plea ( People v. Schiskie, 24 A.D.2d 807; People v. Brim, 22 Misc.2d 335). We conclude that there was substantial compliance with section 480 of Code of Criminal Procedure.


Summaries of

People ex rel. La Fay v. McMann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 19, 1970
33 A.D.2d 1102 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)
Case details for

People ex rel. La Fay v. McMann

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. FRED LA FAY, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 19, 1970

Citations

33 A.D.2d 1102 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

People v. Oliver

May 21, 1970 Judgment of conviction rendered on February 4, 1969, sentencing defendant-appellant to State…

People v. Glover

As the court stated in People v. Sadness ( 300 N.Y. 69, 73), "As we read the language of section 335,…