From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PEOPLE EX REL. KILGALLON v. NUHN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

March, 1916.


We think that the disposition made by the Special Term was right. The opinion of Maddox, J., who presided in that court, renders any discussion by us unnecessary. The opinion as printed in the record and as published ( 92 Misc. Rep. 312) states that Browning, King Co. v. Chamberlain ( 150 App. Div. 392) was affirmed in 210 New York, 270. This was probably a slip of the pen. That case was reversed. (See 210 N.Y. 270, 274.) The order of the Special Term is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

PEOPLE EX REL. KILGALLON v. NUHN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

PEOPLE EX REL. KILGALLON v. NUHN

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. LUKE KILGALLON, Appellant, v …

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1916

Citations

173 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)