From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Haase v. Goldfogle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

January, 1928


Order exempting relators' property from taxation for local purposes, etc., affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Young, Hagarty and Seeger, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents; Carswell, J., dissents, with the following memorandum:

Assuming the certificate herein is conclusive evidence under the statute, it is only so as to houses built under the February 20, 1924, plans specified in the certificate. It is not conclusive as to houses built under new plans filed subsequently to April 1, 1924, and not recited in the certificate as of a date entitling them to tax exemption. If, as may be shown and appears to be the fact, the houses were constructed under plans filed subsequently to the exemption period, the certificate is not conclusive as to these different buildings constructed under such new plans. The houses so constructed herein, if different structures, in form and number, from those specified in the certificate as being built or to be built under plans filed February 20, 1924, cannot be deemed mere modifications of the buildings described in the original plans, and they, therefore, are not entitled to exemption.

See Tax Law, § 4-b, added by Laws of 1920, chap. 949, as amd. by Laws of 1922, chap. 281, and Laws of 1923, chaps. 243, 337; since amd. by Laws of 1924, chap. 87. — [REP.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Haase v. Goldfogle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Haase v. Goldfogle

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. EDWARD HAASE and Another…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1928

Citations

222 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)