From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex rel. Graham v. New York State Department of Corrections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 1, 2001
280 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

February 1, 2001.

Appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court (Castellino, J.), entered August 11, 2000 in Chemung County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Charles E. Graham Jr., Marcy, appellant in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Nancy A. Spiegel of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Petitioner commenced this habeas corpus proceeding claiming that he was being unlawfully detained beyond his conditional release date due to a technical violation of parole and seeks to be restored to parole supervision. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued. During the pendency of petitioner's appeal to this Court, petitioner was conditionally released from custody and currently is on parole. Inasmuch as habeas corpus relief is no longer available, this appeal is dismissed as moot. Petitioner's remaining contentions are either lacking in merit or not properly before this Court.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

People ex rel. Graham v. New York State Department of Corrections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 1, 2001
280 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People ex rel. Graham v. New York State Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. CHARLES E. GRAHAM JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 1, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
719 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Schoenwandt v. Travis

During the pendency of this appeal, petitioner was conditionally released on parole. Inasmuch as petitioner…

People ex Rel. Knoblauch v. Murray

We affirm. Initially, we note that on December 21, 2001, during the pendency of this appeal, petitioner was…