From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parrilla v. Saphire

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 12, 2017
149 A.D.3d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

04-12-2017

Jessica PARRILLA, etc., et al., appellants, v. Gary SAPHIRE, etc., et al., respondents, et al., defendant.

Burns & Harris, New York, N.Y. (Jean M. Prabhu of counsel), for appellants. Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLP, Valhalla, N.Y. (Jacqueline Mandell of counsel), for respondents.


Burns & Harris, New York, N.Y. (Jean M. Prabhu of counsel), for appellants.

Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLP, Valhalla, N.Y. (Jacqueline Mandell of counsel), for respondents.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for podiatric malpractice and lack of informed consent, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Weston, J.), dated November 17, 2015, which denied their motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, but which was, in actuality, one for leave to reargue their opposition to the prior motion of the defendants Gary Saphire and Parkway Podiatry Group for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Motion by the defendants Gary Saphire and Parkway Podiatry Group, inter alia, to dismiss the appeal on the ground, among other things, that no appeal lies from an order denying reargument. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated October 21, 2016, that branch of the motion which was to dismiss the appeal was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see Rosendale v. Harrison & Burrowes Bridge Constructors, Inc., 78 A.D.3d 680, 909 N.Y.S.2d 911 ; Nasr v. Schwartz, 288 A.D.2d 197, 732 N.Y.S.2d 377 ).

LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS–RADIX and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Parrilla v. Saphire

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 12, 2017
149 A.D.3d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Parrilla v. Saphire

Case Details

Full title:Jessica PARRILLA, etc., et al., appellants, v. Gary SAPHIRE, etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 12, 2017

Citations

149 A.D.3d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
149 A.D.3d 859