Opinion
2021-69907 Motion 2021-02121 2021-02131 2021-02204
08-05-2021
Unpublished Opinion
MOTION DECISION
PRESENT: Hon. Dianne T. Renwick, Justice Presiding, Cynthia S. Kern Jeffrey K. Oing Peter H. Moulton Manuel J. Mendez, Justices.
An appeal having been taken to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about September 28, 2017, denying petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus (Case No. 2017-01048), And an order of a Justice of this Court having been entered on October 5, 2017, inter alia, (1) setting bail for Ind. No. 3065/17 at $125,000/insurance bond or cash, with a 72-hour surety examination period; (2) reinstating bail under Ind. No. 5342/15 to $50,000 of the original posted bail bond exoneration of which was stayed; and (3) reinstating bail under Ind. No. 1614N/17 to $10,000, exoneration of which had been stayed, And an order of this Court having been entered on November 9, 2017 (M-5321) maintaining the relief granted by the order of a Justice of this court dated October 5, 2017, And an order of this Court having been entered on September 26, 2019 (M-3531) granting petitioner's motion for a writ of habeas corpus and other relief to the extent of transferring the proceeding to be heard by a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, forthwith, And an order of this Court having been entered on March 19, 2020 (M-86/8643) denying petitioner's motions to reargue a decision and order of this Court entered on November 12, 2019 (Appeal No. 10497), And an order of this Court having been entered on January 21, 2021 (M-2021-04016) denying petitioner's motion to reargue and/or renew this Court's aforesaid order entered on March 19, 2020, or for alternative relief, And an order of this Court having been entered on February 16, 2021 (M-2021-4018) denying petitioner's motion for an amended writ of habeas corpus to be issued from this Court and for related relief, And petitioner, pro se, having moved by three separate motions, inter alia, for writs of habeas corpus to be issued from this Court, and for poor person relief, Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motions, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is ordered that the motions are denied and the petitions dismissed. That branch of the motions seeking poor person relief are denied as academic.