From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Fiske v. Schum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 16, 1918
181 App. Div. 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)

Opinion

January 16, 1918.

George H. Taylor, Jr. [ James H. Cavanaugh with him on the brief], for the appellant.

Arthur M. Johnson [ Sydney A. Syme and Frank A. Bennett with him on the brief], for the respondents.


In the ballot marked with the word "Fiske" the inspectors might have found an intent to vote for the relator, but they did not so find, and instead, agreed on a separate return, which appeared to treat such vote as not for the relator. As there was no protest in regard to this ballot, we agree that after the inspectors had failed to find the voter's intent to be for relator, the court in the original proceeding was not empowered to count this vote for the relator, and the order of December 26, 1917, must be affirmed, but without costs.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in 181 Appellate Division, 702, decided herewith, we are of opinion that the Denton challenge was not such a protest as authorized the subsequent orders for a recount and recanvass, and that, therefore, such order of January 7, 1918, must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

JENKS, P.J., RICH, PUTNAM, BLACKMAR and KELLY, JJ., concurred.

Order of December 26, 1917, affirmed, without costs. Order of January 7, 1918, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Fiske v. Schum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 16, 1918
181 App. Div. 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Fiske v. Schum

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. EDWIN W. FISKE, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 16, 1918

Citations

181 App. Div. 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
168 N.Y.S. 967