From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Field v. Cronshaw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 1988
138 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

March 28, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Yachnin, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

New York law prohibits the practice of law in this State on behalf of anyone other than himself or herself by a person who is not an admitted member of the Bar, regardless of the authority purportedly conferred by execution of a power of attorney (Judiciary Law §§ 478, 484; New York Criminal Civ. Cts. Bar Assn. v. Jacoby, 61 N.Y.2d 130, 136). After reviewing the record herein, and particularly in view of the fact that the appellant has previously retained counsel in prior custody proceedings, we agree with the trial court's conclusion that the appellant's claim that retaining counsel now would conflict with her religious beliefs does not raise a constitutional issue. Brown, J.P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Field v. Cronshaw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 1988
138 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Field v. Cronshaw

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. JOHN FIELD, on Behalf of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 28, 1988

Citations

138 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Watson v. City Univ. of N.Y.

That is because "New York law prohibits the practice of law in this State on behalf of anyone other than…

U.S. Bank v. Speller

More broadly, as Mr. Speller does not claim to be an attorney-at-law his purported representation of Ms.…