From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Feldman v. Warden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 1975
48 A.D.2d 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

June 12, 1975


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 1, 1975, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements, the petition granted and bail fixed at $125,000 cash bail or security satisfactory to the court. Appeal from judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 26, 1975, dismissed as moot, without costs and without disbursements. The petitioner was arraigned with two codefendants and was later indicted on a charge of conspiracy in the first degree and criminal possession and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and possession of a weapon as a felony. The bail was initially set at $125,000. He made an application for bail re-evaluation, at which time the District Attorney disclosed ex parte to the court circumstances which led to the petitioner being held without bail. During the course of ensuing proceedings, the District Attorney provided counsel for the petitioner with an affidavit disclosing the information that had resulted in the revocation of bail, which quoted an associate of the petitioner in a statement to undercover investigators that in the event the petitioner was not incarcerated, he would abscond, and that his female codefendant would be done away with. The purpose of bail, of course, is to ensure the appearance of the defendant. (Bellamy v Judges Justices, 41 A.D.2d 196, affd without opn 32 N.Y.2d 886.) The danger to witnesses would be a proper basis for denying bail. (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 N.Y.2d 497, 502.) However, as stated in the opinion of Breitel, J. (now Chief Judge) (p 502): "If witness-tampering is the risk in this case, the direct actor in such witness-tampering would not have to be and would not likely be the one man at whom the finger of guilt would be poised immediately." This petitioner has a family and roots in the community. Under the circumstances, we herewith restore bail as originally fixed. (Cf. People ex rel. Barnes v Warden, 47 A.D.2d 722.)

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Kupferman, Murphy, Tilzer and Capozzoli, JJ.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Feldman v. Warden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 1975
48 A.D.2d 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Feldman v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. JERRY FELDMAN, on Behalf of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 12, 1975

Citations

48 A.D.2d 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Shaw v. Lombard

New York obviously embraces the first situation. The purpose of requiring the defendant to post bail after…

People v. Forman

12 (1) must be read as incorporating the authority of a court entering a securing order (CPL 500.10), to…