In People ex rel. Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Wemple (129 N.Y. 664) the court say: "We do not think it is material how, or under what particular statute the relator came into existence as a corporation.
Summary of this case from People ex Rel. Paving Co. v. MorganArgued December 14, 1891
Decided January 20, 1892
Charles F. Tabor, Attorney-General, for appellant.
Eugene H. Lewis for respondents.
O'BRIEN, J., reads for reversal.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.
In People ex rel. Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Wemple (129 N.Y. 664) the court say: "We do not think it is material how, or under what particular statute the relator came into existence as a corporation.
Summary of this case from People ex Rel. Paving Co. v. MorganFull title:THE PEOPLE ex rel. THE EDISON ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY of New York…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 20, 1892
Even prior to the repeal of the statute of 1848 and the other statutes having special reference to the…