Opinion
Argued February 29, 1892
Decided May 3, 1892
Eugene H. Lewis for motion.
Simon W. Rosendale, Attorney-General, opposed.
O'BRIEN, J., reads for denial of motion, except as to interest.
All concur.
Motion denied.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
People ex Rel. Edison Elec. Illuminating Co. v. Wemple
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 3, 1892
30 N.E. 1002 (N.Y. 1892)
Summaries of
People ex Rel. Edison Elec. Illuminating Co. v. Wemple
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 3, 1892
30 N.E. 1002 (N.Y. 1892)
Case details for
People ex Rel. Edison Elec. Illuminating Co. v. Wemple
Case Details
Full title:THE PEOPLE ex rel. THE EDISON ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY of New York…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: May 3, 1892
Citations
30 N.E. 1002 (N.Y. 1892)
30 N.E. 1002
44 N.Y. St. Rptr. 871
Citing Cases
People ex Rel. Western U. Tel. Co. v. Roberts
The defendant claimed that the readjustment in 1891 was made without authority of law; that the taxes for…
People ex Rel. Lehigh Val. R.R. Co. v. SohmerIt seems to me clear that on this application the court should not hold whether the taxes assessed and paid…