Opinion
June 4, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Kane, J.
Present — Callahan, J.P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied relator's application for a writ of habeas corpus. Relator may not obtain relief in this proceeding for the alleged denial of his right to a speedy trial, especially since he never raised this issue at or before trial (see, People ex rel. LeMon v. Mancusi, 31 N.Y.2d 679). His claim of ineffective assistance of counsel does not entitle him to habeas corpus relief (see, People ex rel. Douglas v. Vincent, 50 N.Y.2d 901); nor would he be entitled to relief in the nature of coram nobis because his allegations concerning ineffective assistance of counsel are conclusory and are not supported by evidentiary facts entitling him to a hearing (see, People v. Session, 34 N.Y.2d 254, 255-256). Relator's other grounds for relief are insufficient since they were raised or could have been on his appeal from the judgment of conviction (see, People ex rel. Douglas v. Vincent, 67 A.D.2d 587, affd 50 N.Y.2d 901, supra).