From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Dennis Chesner v. Warden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 16, 2010
71 A.D.3d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2356.

March 16, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Analisa Torres, J.), entered May 21, 2009, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Elon Harpaz of counsel), for appellant.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York (Diana R.H. Winters of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ.


Petitioner's preliminary parole revocation hearing was commenced within 15 days after execution of the warrant (Executive Law § 259-i [c] [i]) and briefly adjourned, without objection, for legitimate reasons. Thus, there was no violation of the 15-day time limit ( see People ex rel. Morant v Warden, Rikers Is., 35 AD3d 208, lv denied 8 NY3d 809; Matter of Emmick v Enders, 107 AD2d 1066, appeal dismissed 65 NY2d 1050).

Further, petitioner waived his objection to the timeliness of the hearing by failing to object to the adjournment and failing to show that he was prejudiced by it ( see People ex rel. Morant v Warden, Rikers Is. 35 AD3d 208).


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Dennis Chesner v. Warden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 16, 2010
71 A.D.3d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Dennis Chesner v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. DENNIS CHESNER, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 16, 2010

Citations

71 A.D.3d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 2004
895 N.Y.S.2d 816

Citing Cases

People v. Warden

Decided June 29, 2010. Appeal from the 1d Dept: 71 AD3d 499. Motions for Leave to Appeal…

People v. Bd. of Parole

Initially, this court notes that petitioner is procedurally barred from asserting a claim challenging the…