From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Davidson v. Morhous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 11, 1942
265 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

November 11, 1942.

Appeal from County Court of Washington County.


Appellant was convicted on October 25, 1934, of the crime of criminally buying, concealing and withholding stolen property. He was sentenced, as a second offender, to serve a definite sentence of twenty years. At the time of his conviction a sentence of twenty years was the maximum punishment for the crime of which he was convicted. Subsequently the maximum punishment for this offense was reduced to ten years' imprisonment (Penal Law, § 1308; Cons. Laws, ch. 40; amd. by L. 1940, ch. 443), but the amendment to the statute was not made retroactive. Appellant's sole contention is that he should be resentenced and his term reduced as a matter of discretion. The original sentence was proper, in fact mandatory, and under such circumstances this court has no power to reduce the sentence upon appeal in a habeas corpus proceeding. Upon appeal from a judgment of conviction a reduction might be made, but not otherwise. (Code Crim. Pro., § 543; People v. Spagnolia, 260 App. Div. 551.) Order appealed from affirmed without costs. Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ., concur; Hill, P.J., dissents.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Davidson v. Morhous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 11, 1942
265 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Davidson v. Morhous

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. GRANVILLE DAVIDSON, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 11, 1942

Citations

265 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Citing Cases

People v. Zuckerman

As a matter of law, this court is without power to change such a sentence ( People v. Porfido, 279 App. Div.…

People ex rel. Hicks v. La Vallee

Relator claims he should be entitled to the benefit of this legislative modification of punishment. (Penal…