From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Cropsey v. Townsend

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 18, 1916
112 N.E. 334 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued February 25, 1916

Decided April 18, 1916

James C. Cropsey, District Attorney ( Ralph E. Hemstreet and Hersey Egginton of counsel), for appellant.

E.E. Woodbury, Attorney-General ( Edward G. Griffin of counsel), for respondents.


We think that Bassi, the paroled prisoner, was a necessary party to this proceeding ( Matter of Jones v. Willcox, 80 App. Div. 167, 170; Powell v. People, 214 Ill. 475; R. v. Bankes, 3 Burr. 1452), and the failure to make him a party leaves us unable to determine the validity of the parole.

The order should be affirmed without prejudice to the renewal of the application when the proper parties are before the court.

WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO, SEABURY and POUND, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Cropsey v. Townsend

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 18, 1916
112 N.E. 334 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Cropsey v. Townsend

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. JAMES C. CROPSEY, as District…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 18, 1916

Citations

112 N.E. 334 (N.Y. 1916)
112 N.E. 334

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Cropsey v. Townsend

Motion for re-argument denied. (See 218 N.Y. 615.)…

Matter of Green v. Miller

Indeed, many cases in this State and elsewhere are to the contrary. ( People ex rel. Cooke v. Stewart, 77…