From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Clancy v. Bingham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 10, 1908
123 App. Div. 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Opinion

January 10, 1908.

Daniel F. Cohalan, for the relator.

Theodore Connoly, for the respondent.

Present — PATTERSON, P.J., INGRAHAM, LAUGHLIN, CLARKE and SCOTT, JJ.


The relator, a member of the police force detailed as a member of the tenement house squad, was charged with having assaulted and insulted a young colored woman, and after a trial was convicted and dismissed from the force. It is alleged in the petition and not denied by the return that the relator was given less than forty-eight hours' notice of trial, the notice having been served on him at one-thirty-five P.M. on February twenty-sixth to appear for trial at ten A.M. on February twenty-eighth, thus giving him only forty-four and one-half hours' notice. The rule of the department (36g) requires that notice of trial shall be served not less than forty-eight hours before the hour of trial, exclusive of Sundays, legal holidays and half-holidays. The defendant when arraigned for trial asked for an adjournment, which was denied. The failure to give sufficient notice was fatal to the validity of the proceedings, and the writ must be sustained, the determination of the respondent annulled and the relator reinstated, with fifty dollars costs.


Proceedings annulled and relator reinstated, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Clancy v. Bingham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 10, 1908
123 App. Div. 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Clancy v. Bingham

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. PETER CLANCY, Relator, v …

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 10, 1908

Citations

123 App. Div. 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
107 N.Y.S. 1063

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Mencke v. Bingham

March, 1909. Determination of the respondent annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, and the…

People ex Rel. McCarthy v. Bingham

Failure to give the prescribed notice is fatal to the proceeding. ( People ex rel. Jordan v. Martin, 152 N.Y.…