From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Burns v. Lyons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 5, 1943
266 App. Div. 1053 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Opinion

November 5, 1943.

Present — Crosby, P.J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.


Order reversed on the law without costs and proceeding dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: The State Civil Service Commission, at the request of appellant, certified the names of three guards for promotion to the position of sergeant in their graded order, namely: (1) Wilkins, (2) Burns (petitioner-respondent) and (3) Johnson. All had passed competitive civil service examinations for the position and had claimed and received a preference as disabled war veterans (Civil Service Law, § 21; Rules for Classified Civil Service, rule XI, subd. 1). We think that subdivision 2 of rule VIII, applied, and gave to appellant the right to select any one of these three disabled veterans and that the appointment of Johnson was valid. All concur. (The order directs defendant to appoint petitioner to the rank of sergeant in the Department of Correction.)


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Burns v. Lyons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 5, 1943
266 App. Div. 1053 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Burns v. Lyons

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. FRANCIS E. BURNS, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 5, 1943

Citations

266 App. Div. 1053 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Citing Cases

MATTER OF NATHANSON v. Adams

" The respondent insists that in not appointing the petitioner he exercised the right of selection so…

Matter of Nathanson v. Adams

The respondent insists that in not appointing the petitioner he exercised the right of selection so conferred…