From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Bridgeport Savings Bank v. Barker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1897
19 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

Opinion

June Term, 1897.


Order affirmed, with costs.


It was determined in the case of The People ex rel. Groton Savings Bank v. Barker, ( ante, p. 64), that the amounts due from a savings bank to its depositors were debts which should be deducted from the amount of its gross assets to ascertain the net surplus for taxation. It was determined also in that case that in ascertaining the amount of the gross assets of the bank the actual value of its property in all cases was to be taken, and that from the amount of the assets thus ascertained was to be deducted the amount of its debts, and in that way the surplus was to be fixed. It was further determined that from that surplus was to be deducted the property not taxable anywhere, the property taxable elsewhere and the cash on hand, and that the net surplus was the amount properly taxable in this State. Upon applying these rules to this case we find that there is no surplus after making these deductions, but on the contrary that there is a considerable deficiency. For that reason, it was not proper for the the commissioners to assess the bank stock of the relator and the order vacating the assessment must be affirmed, with costs. Van Brunt, P.J., Williams, Patterson and Ingraham, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Bridgeport Savings Bank v. Barker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1897
19 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Bridgeport Savings Bank v. Barker

Case Details

Full title:The People ex rel. The Bridgeport Savings Bank, Respondent, v. Edward P…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1897

Citations

19 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)