From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex rel. Azeez v. Superintendent J. Noeth Attica Corr. Facility

STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT : COUNTY OF WYOMING
May 15, 2019
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 31664 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2019)

Opinion

Index No. 22091-20

05-15-2019

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. ABDOOL AZEEZ, #18-A-0314 Relator v. SUPERINTENDENT J. NOETH ATTICA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Respondent


At a term of Supreme Court held in and for the County of Wyoming, in Warsaw, New York, on the 15th day of May, 2020. PRESENT: MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Upon reading and filing the above-named relator's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, verified on April 25, 2020, the Court finds that the petition is facially insufficient because it fails to comply with the requirements of CPLR §7002(c) (see Matter of Tullis v. Kelly, 154 A.D.2d 926 [1989]; People ex rel Medina v. Senkowski, 265 A.D.2d 779 [1999]). The Court further finds that the petition must be dismissed because the matter is inappropriate for habeas corpus relief. In his petition, the relator is seeking to collaterally attack a judgment of conviction and sentence rendered in another court based upon grounds which either have been, or which could be, raised and decided through a direct appeal (the Court notes that the relator's direct appeal is currently pending, see The People, etc., respondent, v. Abdool Shaad Azeez, appellant, 2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 85411(U) [motion decision, 2nd Dept., December 5, 2019]), or through a proceeding brought for relief pursuant to CPL Article 440 (see People ex rel. Knox v. Smith, 60 A.D.2d 789 [4th Dept., 1977], leave to appeal denied by 43 N.Y.2d 647 [1978]; People ex rel. Abdullah v. Walker, 199 A.D.2d 1074 [4th Dept., 1993], leave to appeal denied by 83 N.Y.2d 752 [1994]; People ex rel. Spencer v. Burge, 307 A.D.2d 772 [4th Dept., 2003]; People ex rel. Reed v. Travis, 12 A.D.3d 1102 [4th Dept., 2005], leave to appeal denied by 4 N.Y.3d 704 [2004]; People ex rel. Gloss v. Murray, 35 A.D.3d 1186 [4th Dept., 2006], leave to appeal denied by 8 N.Y.3d 807 [2007]). The relator has not shown that a basis exists for a departure from "traditional orderly procedure" in this case (People ex rel. Tuszynski v. Stallone, 117 A.D.3d 1472 [4th Dept., 2014]; People ex rel. Keitt v. McMann, 18 N.Y.2d 257 [1966]),

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby

ORDERED that the petition is denied in all respects without a hearing. Dated: May 15, 2019

/s/_________

MICHAEL M. MOHUN

Acting Supreme Court Justice


Summaries of

People ex rel. Azeez v. Superintendent J. Noeth Attica Corr. Facility

STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT : COUNTY OF WYOMING
May 15, 2019
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 31664 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2019)
Case details for

People ex rel. Azeez v. Superintendent J. Noeth Attica Corr. Facility

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. ABDOOL AZEEZ, #18-A-0314…

Court:STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT : COUNTY OF WYOMING

Date published: May 15, 2019

Citations

2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 31664 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2019)