From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People Cropsey v. the Court of Spec. Sessions, N.Y

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 7, 1916
112 N.E. 1070 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued February 22, 1916

Decided March 7, 1916

James C. Cropsey, District Attorney ( Harry G. Anderson and Hersey Egginton of counsel), for appellant.

Lamar Hardy, Corporation Counsel ( Thomas F. Magner and George A. Green of counsel), for Court of Special Sessions, respondent.

John L. Danzilo for Azzento Philippo, respondent.


Ordered affirmed, without costs, on opinion of JENKS, P.J., below.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

People Cropsey v. the Court of Spec. Sessions, N.Y

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 7, 1916
112 N.E. 1070 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

People Cropsey v. the Court of Spec. Sessions, N.Y

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. JAMES C. CROPSEY, as District…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 7, 1916

Citations

112 N.E. 1070 (N.Y. 1916)
112 N.E. 1070

Citing Cases

People v. Hershey Farms, Inc.

Looking through cases of other jurisdictions, it is to be noted that their statutes are different from ours,…

MATTER OF QUINN v. Shapiro

For instance, section 484 of the Code of Criminal Procedure specifically provides that an inferior court of…