From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peon v. Thornburgh

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 21, 1991
765 F. Supp. 155 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)

Summary

rejecting argument that Attorney General was alien's custodian for purpose of alien's habeas petition

Summary of this case from Roman v. Ashcroft

Opinion

No. 91 Civ. 3229 (LLS).

June 21, 1991.

Lazaro Dreke Peon, pro se.

James A. O'Brien, III, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City, for respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Petitioner Lazaro Dreke Peon seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988), asserting that he is being held by the Immigration and Naturalization Service unlawfully. Respondent argues that since petitioner is incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institute in Raybrook, New York, which is in the Northern District of New York, this court has no jurisdiction to consider the petition.

A petition for habeas corpus must be brought against the petitioner's custodian, and the court considering the petition must have jurisdiction over that custodian. Billiteri v. United States Bd. of Parole, 541 F.2d 938, 948 (2d Cir. 1976); see also Braden v. 30th Judicial Cir. Ct., 410 U.S. 484, 93 S.Ct. 1123, 35 L.Ed.2d 443 (1973). In this case, petitioner's custodian is Raybrook's warden, rather than the Attorney General. See Billiteri, 541 F.2d at 948. Since Raybrook is located in the Northern District of New York, the petition must be brought there. See ibid.; In re Tripati, 836 F.2d 1406, 1407 (D.C. Cir. 1988) (per curiam) (petition must be brought in district in which petitioner's custodian is located); Hassain v. Johnson, 790 F.2d 1420, 1420 (9th Cir. 1986) (per curiam) (same), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1038, 107 S.Ct. 893, 93 L.Ed.2d 845 (1987).

However, as respondent suggests, in the interest of justice, to avoid unnecessary delay of consideration of the petition's merits, this action should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (1988), rather than dismissed.

Accordingly, the clerk of the court is ordered to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.


Summaries of

Peon v. Thornburgh

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 21, 1991
765 F. Supp. 155 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)

rejecting argument that Attorney General was alien's custodian for purpose of alien's habeas petition

Summary of this case from Roman v. Ashcroft

rejecting contention that Attorney General was alien's custodian for habeas purposes and transferring petition accordingly

Summary of this case from Vasquez v. Reno

transferring § 2241 petition under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 "in the interest of justice to avoid unnecessary delay of consideration of the petitioner's merits"

Summary of this case from Dean v. Warden

transferring habeas petition to Northern District of New York

Summary of this case from Diallo v. Holmes

transferring § 2241 petition under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 "in the interest of justice to avoid unnecessary delay of consideration of the petition's merits"

Summary of this case from Tejeda v. Reno
Case details for

Peon v. Thornburgh

Case Details

Full title:Lazaro Dreke PEON, Petitioner, v. Richard THORNBURGH, in his official…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 21, 1991

Citations

765 F. Supp. 155 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)

Citing Cases

Roman v. Ashcroft

For courts treating the warden of the facility where an alien is detained as the alien's immediate custodian,…

Diallo v. Holmes

A writ of habeas corpus is directed to the custodian of a detainee, and no writ may issue where the court…