From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pentel Co. v. Kappos

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 13, 2012
470 F. App'x 900 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2012-1002

06-13-2012

PENTEL CO., LTD. AND PENTEL OF AMERICA, LTD., Appellants, v. DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Appellee, and BENJAMIN J. KWITEK, Appellee.

BRUCE L. ADAMS, Adams & Wilks, of New York, New York, argued appellants. NATHAN K. KELLEY, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee David J. Kappos, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Associate Solicitor. ROBERT R. LYONS, Littman Law Offices, Ltd., Manassas Virginia, for appellee BENJAMIN J. KWITEK.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Reexamination No. 95/000,399).

JUDGMENT

BRUCE L. ADAMS, Adams & Wilks, of New York, New York, argued appellants.

NATHAN K. KELLEY, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee David J. Kappos, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Associate Solicitor.

ROBERT R. LYONS, Littman Law Offices, Ltd., Manassas Virginia, for appellee BENJAMIN J. KWITEK. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LINN, PLAGER, and DYK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Pentel Co. v. Kappos

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 13, 2012
470 F. App'x 900 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Pentel Co. v. Kappos

Case Details

Full title:PENTEL CO., LTD. AND PENTEL OF AMERICA, LTD., Appellants, v. DAVID J…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 13, 2012

Citations

470 F. App'x 900 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Interform, Inc. v. Staples, Inc.

Also of note, the reexamination proceedings included an appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and…