From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penrod v. Quick

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 19, 2011
458 F. App'x 280 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-6967

12-19-2011

DONALD ADAM PENROD, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DON QUICK, Adams County District Attorney; CAROL CHAMBERS, Arapahoe County District Attorney, Respondents - Appellees.

Donald Adam Penrod, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:11-hc-02012-D)

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Adam Penrod, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donald Adam Penrod appeals the district court's order denying relief on his "Independent Action to Enjoin a Void Judgment Procured by Gross 'Fraud on the Court.'" We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Penrod v. Quick, No. 5:11-hc-02012-D (E.D.N.C. June 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Penrod v. Quick

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 19, 2011
458 F. App'x 280 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Penrod v. Quick

Case Details

Full title:DONALD ADAM PENROD, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DON QUICK, Adams County…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 19, 2011

Citations

458 F. App'x 280 (4th Cir. 2011)