From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pennsylvania v. Thomas E. Proctor Heirs Trust & the Margaret Proctor Trust

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 26, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-1567 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 26, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-1567

09-26-2017

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMISSION, Plaintiff v. THOMAS E. PROCTOR HEIRS TRUST and the MARGARET PROCTOR TRUST, Defendants


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2017, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 77) of Chief Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab, recommending that the court deny plaintiff's motion (Doc. 67) to dismiss defendants' counterclaim or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement or to strike certain paragraphs of said pleading, and the court noting that plaintiff filed partial objections (Doc. 78) to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and defendants filed a response (Doc. 79) thereto, and, following a de novo review of the contested portions of the report, see Behar v. Pa. Dep't of Transp., 791 F. Supp. 2d 383, 389 (M.D. Pa. 2011) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1106 n.3 (3d Cir. 1989)), and applying a clear error standard of review to the uncontested portions, see Cruz v. Chater, 990 F. Supp. 375, 376-78 (M.D. Pa. 1999), the court in full agreement with Judge Schwab's ratio decidendi, and finding same to be thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported by the record and the decisional law identified in the report, and finding plaintiff's objections (Doc. 78) to be without merit and squarely addressed by the report, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 77) of Chief Magistrate Judge Schwab is ADOPTED in its entirety.

2. Plaintiffs' motion (Doc. 67) to dismiss defendants' counterclaim or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement or to strike certain paragraphs of said pleading is DENIED.

3. The above-captioned matter is REMANDED to Chief Magistrate Judge Schwab for further pretrial management.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Pennsylvania v. Thomas E. Proctor Heirs Trust & the Margaret Proctor Trust

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 26, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-1567 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 26, 2017)
Case details for

Pennsylvania v. Thomas E. Proctor Heirs Trust & the Margaret Proctor Trust

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMISSION, Plaintiff v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 26, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-1567 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 26, 2017)